Question - Does internal validity affect external validity?

Answered by: Julia Ward  |  Category: General  |  Last Updated: 23-06-2022  |  Views: 506  |  Total Questions: 14

Internal validity refers to the degree of confidence that the causal relationship being tested is trustworthy and not influenced by other factors or variables. External validity refers to the extent to which results from a study can be applied (generalized) to other situations, groups or events. Differences. The essential difference between internal and external validity is that internal validity refers to the structure of a study and its variables while external validity relates to how universal the results are. There are further differences between the two as well. Reliability and validity describe desirable psychometric characteristics of research instruments. Internal validity examines whether the study design, conduct, and analysis answer the research questions without bias. External validity examines whether the study findings can be generalized to other contexts. A study that readily allows its findings to generalise to the population at large has high external validity. To the degree that we are successful in eliminating confounding variables within the study itself is referred to as internal validity. Internal validity is the quality of an experimental design such that the results obtained can be attributed to the manipulation of the independent variable, whereas external validity is the quality of an experimental design such that the results can be generalized from the original sample and by extension, to the

https://www.statisticshowto.datasciencecentral.com/internal-validity/

Internal validity is a way to measure if research is sound (i. e. was the research done right? ). It is related to how many confounding variables you have in your experiment. For example, let's suppose you ran an experiment to see if mice lost weight when they exercised on a wheel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_validity

Some examples include: Aptitude–treatment Interaction: The sample may have certain features that interact with the independent variable, limiting generalizability. For example, comparative psychotherapy studies often employ specific samples (e. g. volunteers, highly depressed, no comorbidity).

http://linguistics.byu.edu/faculty/henrichsenl/ResearchMethods/RM_2_18.html

Here are some factors which affect internal validity: Subject variability. Size of subject population. Time given for the data collection or experimental treatment. History. Attrition. Maturation. Instrument/task sensitivity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validity_(statistics)

Validity is the extent to which a concept, conclusion or measurement is well-founded and likely corresponds accurately to the real world. The validity of a measurement tool (for example, a test in education) is the degree to which the tool measures what it claims to measure.

https://www.statsdirect.com/help/basics/validity.htm

This type of internal validity could be assessed by comparing questionnaire responses with objective measures of the states or events to which they refer; for example comparing the self-reported amount of cigarette smoking with some objective measure such as cotinine levels in breath.

https://opentext.wsu.edu/carriecuttler/chapter/reliability-and-validity-of-measurement/

Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure. Validity is the extent to which the scores from a measure represent the variable they are intended to. Face validity is the extent to which a measurement method appears “on its face” to measure the construct of interest.

https://researchbasics.education.uconn.edu/external_validity/

There are two types of study validity: internal (more applicable with experimental research) and external. This section covers external validity. External validity involves the extent to which the results of a study can be generalized (applied) beyond the sample.

https://www.statisticssolutions.com/validity/

These types are Internal, External, Statistically Conclusive and Construct. Internal Validity refers to the type where there is a causal relationship between the variables. External Validity refers to the type where there is a causal relationship between the cause and the effect.

http://www.indiana.edu/~p1013447/dictionary/int_val.htm

Internal validity refers to how well an experiment is done, especially whether it avoids confounding (more than one possible independent variable [cause] acting at the same time). The less chance for confounding in a study, the higher its internal validity is.

https://www.ets.org/gre/institutions/about/fairness/content_construct_validity/

Content and Construct Validity. Construct validity means the test measures the skills/abilities that should be measured. Content validity means the test measures appropriate content.

https://study.com/academy/lesson/external-validity-in-psychology-threats-definition-examples.html

External validity refers to the extent to which the conclusions from your research study can be generalized to the people outside of your study. There are three types of generalization: population, environmental, and temporal.

https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-validity-of-measurement-definition-importance-types.html

There are four main types of validity: Face validity is the extent to which a tool appears to measure what it is supposed to measure. Construct validity is the extent to which a tool measures an underlying construct. Content validity is the extent to which items are relevant to the content being measured.

A study is considered to be externally valid if the researcher's conclusions can in fact be accurately generalized to the population at large. (4) The sample group must be representative of the target population to ensure external validity.

http://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-modules/ProgramEvaluation/ProgramEvaluation6.html

Tips include: Keep an eye out for this if there are multiple observation/test points in your study. Go for consistency. Instrumentation threats can be reduced or eliminated by making every effort to maintain consistency at each observation point.